Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Starkus

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided June 13, 2007No. 06-P-295PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, J.

After a jury trial in the Superior Court, the defendant, David Starkus, was found to be a sexually dangerous person and committed to the Massachusetts Treatment Center at Bridgewater (MTCB) for between one day and life. On appeal, Starkus argues that (1) the police reports pertaining to a 1978 offense should not have been admitted in evidence, nor should either qualified examiner have referred to the information contained therein; (2) the judge erred in excluding a report from a defense expert; (3) the evidence was insufficient to prove that the defendant suffers from a mental abnormality;…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LaniganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  2. Department of Youth Services v. a JuvenileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. ChappeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. MarkvartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  5. Commonwealth v. RichmondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. Shannon S.New York Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. United States v. CartaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  3. Commonwealth v. HusbandMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
  4. SantosMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
  5. Commonwealth v. BradshawMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API