Legal Opinion

Segal v. Cauldwell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 12, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from special term. Action by Adolph Segal against William Cauldwell. From an order requiring plaintiff to give security for costs, he appeals. Affirmed. Argued before VAN BRUNT, P. J., and WILLIAMS, PATTERSON, O’BRIEN, and INGRAHAM, JJ.

1Opinion of the CourtIngraham, J.

We agree with the learned justice who made the order appealed from that a defendant, by failing to move before answer, waives his absolute right to require a nonresident plaintiff to give security for costs. Where a motion is made after answer, the application is addressed to the discretion of the court, and some fact must be shown to excuse the delay. The court below appreciated this rule, but held that in this case the discretion should be exercised in favor of the application; and we do not think that we would be justified in reversing him in the exercise of that discretion. It appeared…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Poa v. RiceHawaii Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Ampel v. SeifertAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API