Legal Opinion
Misbourne Pictures Limited v. Johnson
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 15, 1950PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
S. H. KAUFMAN, District Judge.
The question presented by this case is whether or not plaintiffs are entitled to recover, with interest, $60,300 which was paid to defendant on account of taxes claimed to have become due as the result of a certain transaction between plaintiffs and Samuel Goldwyn, Inc., a New York corporation, and Samuel Goldwyn, individually.
The case was submitted to the court for decision on a stipulation of facts, from which the court finds:
Plaintiffs are corporations organized and existing under the laws of the Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and are engaged…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Celanese Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- Rohmer v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Commissioner v. WodehouseSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Goldsmith v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Sabatini v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Daniel M. Cory and Margot Cory, His Wife, Petitioners-On-Review v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-On-ReviewCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Cory v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
- Misbourne Pictures Limited v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- P.C. Films Corp. v. Turner Entertainment Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Cory v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955