Legal Opinion

Gwin v. Gappa

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 14, 1986No. C7-86-25PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellant, Delores Gwin, brought a declaratory judgment action to determine who was entitled to the benefits of Dale Gappa’s life insurance policy. After a non-jury trial the court found that respondent, Jean Gappa, was the proper beneficiary. On appeal Gwin argues that the trial court erred in finding the designation of beneficiary form invalid; in requiring that Gwin prove the insured had not changed his mind since signing the change of beneficiary form, and in finding that the insured’s intent was unclear and ambiguous. We affirm.

FACTS

At the time of his death, Dale…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gruenhagen v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Brown v. AginSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  3. Lemke v. SchwarzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Boehne v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Larsen v. Northwestern National Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. BellandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  3. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. BundeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  4. State Farm Life Insurance Company v. YoungsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
  5. State Farm Life Insurance Company v. YoungsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API