Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Schnautz

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 29, 2007No. 57987-8-IPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Schindler, A.C.J.

¶1 In this legal malpractice action, the trial court ruled as a matter of law that an attorney’s failure to file a claim against a tortfeasor’s estate prevented the fault-free plaintiff from recovering damages from the other jointly and severally liable tortfeasors for more than the amount of insurance coverage available to the estate. On appeal, the attorney, Stephen Schnautz, challenges the trial court’s ruling. Schnautz also challenges dismissal of his intervening cause defense, based on the successor attorneys’ failure to commence probate proceedings for the tortfeasor’s…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Cockle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Washburn v. Beatt Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vaux-Michel v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. Johnston v. Von HouckCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. Powell v. Associated Counsel for AccusedCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. In Re Estate Of T. Mark Stover Teresa Vaux-michel, Resp/cr-app. v. Anne Simmons, App./cr-resp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API