Legal Opinion

In Re Lettick Typografic, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut

Decided July 20, 1989No. 16-20103PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND DECISION

ALAN H.W. SHIFF, Bankruptcy Judge.

The debtor seeks an order confirming its Third Amended Plan of Reorganization. Although no party in interest has objected, 11 U.S.C. § 1128(b), and the Office of the United States Trustee has filed no comment suggesting that confirmation should be denied, 28 U.S.C. § 586(a)(3)(B), for the reasons that follow I conclude that the debtor has failed to meet its burden of proving that its plan is confirmable. In re Texaco Inc., 84 B.R. 889, 891 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1988) (“Even in the absence of an objection to confirmation by a party in interest,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

Norwest Bank Worthington v. AhlersSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
Case v. Los Angeles Lumber Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
In Re U.S. Truck Company, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, Debtor. Teamsters National Freight Industry Negotiating Committee v. U.S. Truck Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
Gary D. Hanson, Sandra Kay Hanson v. First Bank of South Dakota, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
In Re Pine Lake Village Apartment Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

In Re: Combustion Engineering, Inc. First State Insurance Company Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
Beal Bank, SSB v. Waters Edge Limited PartnershipDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
Connecticut General Life Insurance v. Hotel Associates of Tucson (In Re Hotel Associates of Tucson)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
In Re DrimmelUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1989
In Re Congoleum Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.