Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Sutphen v. Feitner

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1899PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Certiorari to review an assessment for purposes of taxation upon certain real property owned by the relator, in the city of Hew York; The material facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBeekman, J.

The relator has sued out this writ in order to obtain a correction of the assessment of certain real property owned by him which has been made by the respondents for the purposes of taxation for the year 1898. The property so affected consists of vacant lots, fronting on the Riverside Drive, on Seventy-second street and on Seventy-third street, so far contiguous that but for the intervention of a single lot, about midway between the said streets, they, would together embrace the entire frontage of the block on Riverside Drive. It has been assessed at an aggregate sum of $145,000.

On the 28th…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Equitable Gas Light Co. v. BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. People ex rel. New York Clearing House Building Co. v. BarkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Zollikoffer v. FeitnerNew York Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Suburbia Apartments, Inc. v. Board of Assessors of NassauNew York Supreme Court · 1971
  3. People ex rel. Long Island Railroad v. State Board of Tax CommissionersNew York Supreme Court · 1918
  4. People ex rel. Marlborough Hotel Co. v. FeitnerNew York Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Lancaster Sea Beach Improvement Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API