Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Killian

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 16, 1946PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

A suit was instituted by appellees against the appellants "to remove . . . the encroachment upon the property" of the former and to recover damages. Upon consideration of the testimony offered by the parties the chancellor decided that appellants should pay as damages "and for the value of the land" encroached upon the sum of $3000, in return for which appellees should convey to them "said land." In the event of failure to pay this money within sixty days it was ordered that the appellants "remove the encroachment." In approximate figures the "said land" is thirty-two feet in length, one foot…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Geragosian v. Union Realty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Kershishian v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. Pradelt v. LewisIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Allen v. StowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Willis v. HathawaySupreme Court of Florida · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Holley v. MaySupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  2. Shaw v. Tampa Elec. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  3. First National Bank in St. Petersburg v. FerrisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  4. Daniel v. MayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  5. McDowell v. Trustees of Internal Improvement FundSupreme Court of Florida · 1956

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API