Legal Opinion

Foster v. Sukhnanand Lall

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1987PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Martha K. Zelman, J.

The motion of the plaintiff for summary judgment for *920specific performance or in the alternate, $175,000, and other relief is denied. The cross motion of the defendant for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.

The parties entered into a contract on August 18, 1986, whereby the plaintiff would purchase defendant’s home at 104-33 126th Street, Richmond Hill, Queens, New York, for $125,000 with the closing to take place on December 29, 1986. A $5,000 down payment was then given from the plaintiff to the defendant.

Paragraphs 4 and 5 of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Satterly v. PlaistedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. Satterly v. PlaistedNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Poteralski v. ColombeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. Freitas v. HolleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. Lieberman v. PettinatoNew York Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Price v. BartkowiakDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API