Legal Opinion

Holdmann v. Smith Laboratories, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 9, 1989No. 88-2351PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P.J.

This appeal concerns the interpretation of sec. 102.29(1), Stats., which allows employees, employers and compensation carriers to make a claim or maintain an action against a third party for an injury compensable under the worker's compensation statutes. Huck v. Chicago, St. P., M.&O. Ry., 14 Wis. 2d 445, 448, 111 N.W.2d 434, 435 (1961). The statute contains a method by which recovery is divided among the interested parties. Heritage Mutual, worker's compensation carrier for NU Floor, Inc., appeals from a trial court order that denied it a percentage recovery from the Holdmanns' third party…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. SabourinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Marshall-Wisconsin Co. v. Juneau Square Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. GaviganCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  4. Doe v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  5. Spencer v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Honthaners Restaurants, Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
  2. Nelson v. RotheringWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Nelson v. RotheringCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  4. State Ex Rel. Garel v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
  5. Honthaners Restaurants, Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API