Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Maiorino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 28, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for alleged acts of sexual harassment, the defendants appeal, as limited by their notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Seidell, J.), dated April 29, 1993, as granted the plaintiffs’ discovery motion to the extent that it directed the defendants to provide responses to the plaintiff’s interrogatories numbered 5 and 21, and as denied so much of the defendants’ cross motion as sought the dismissal of the plaintiff’s third cause of action.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Zupan v. BlumbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Tutak v. TutakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kooper v. KooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Canet v. Gooch Ware TravelsteadDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
  3. Matter of Aidin v. (Giorgio v.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API