Legal Opinion

Barrick v. Schifferdicker

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1883PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Albany county. The complaint of Caroline and Mary Barrick charged that the defendant, Anna Schifferdicker, created and maintained a nuisance by the erection of an ice-house, and the storage of ice therein, upon her lot, one side of the ice-house being within two inches of the brick dwelling-house and store of the plaintiffs; that the ice injured the walls of their house, rendered it uncomfortable and of less marketable value.

Read the full summary

Appeal from circuit court, Albany county. The complaint of Caroline and Mary Barrick charged that the defendant, Anna Schifferdicker, created and maintained a nuisance by the erection of an ice-house, and the storage of ice therein, upon her lot, one side of the ice-house being within two inches of the brick dwelling-house and store of the plaintiffs; that the ice injured the walls of their house, rendered it uncomfortable and of less marketable value. Plaintiffs were given a general verdict for damages, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLandon, J.

This action is to restrain the continuance of a nuisance, and also to recover the damages caused by it. It is properly triable before a jury. Their verdict determines whether the nuisance exists, aiyl, if so, the amount of damages the plaintiffs have sustained from it. This appears to be a constitutional right of the parties. Hudson v. Caryl, 44 N. Y. 553. Whether an injunction should be granted is a question for the court. But, the right of trial by jury being constitutional, the court must, unless it sets the verdict aside and orders a new trial, adopt the facts found by the jury. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Campbell v. . SeamanNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Francis v. . SchoellkopfNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Fish v. DodgeNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  4. Hale v. . Omaha National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  5. Catlin v. ValentineNew York Court of Chancery · 1842

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Collins v. SargentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Morgan v. BowesNew York Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Robinson v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Burditt v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Hochstrasser v. MartinNew York Supreme Court · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API