Legal Opinion

Zielinski v. Clorox Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 16, 1997No. A97A0801PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff Gary Zielinski sued his former employer, defendant Clorox Company, and one of its plant supervisors, defendant Castle-berry, for false light invasion of privacy after Castleberry made statements at an all-plant meeting allegedly implicating plaintiff in a criminal scheme to defraud Clorox. Plaintiff also sued Castleberry for tortious interference with plaintiff’s employment relationship after Castleberry subsequently recommended to Clorox’s upper management that plaintiff be fired. At trial, the court directed verdicts in favor of Clorox on the invasion of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cabaniss v. HipsleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. Favors v. Alco Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  3. Green v. Johnston Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. Haezebrouck v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. WMH, INC. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Zielinski v. Clorox Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  2. Zielinski v. Clorox Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  3. Andrews v. D'SouzaDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API