Legal Opinion

Miller v. Boston Scientific Corp.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided August 2, 2005No. Civil Action 04-516 (HAA)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

ACKERMAN, Senior District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on a motion to dismiss on forum non conve-niens grounds filed by Defendant Boston Scientific Corporation (“Boston Scientific” or “Defendant”). For the reasons outlined below, Defendant’s motion is GRANTED subject to the conditions discussed in this Opinion and Order.

Background

Plaintiffs Amram Miller and his wife Jacqueline Miller are Israeli citizens and residents who filed a products liability claim against Boston Scientific, a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Massachusetts. On or…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Van Cauwenberghe v. BiardSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Lacey v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Windt v. Qwest Communications International, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
  2. TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD. v. OnischenkoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2007
  3. CORPS LOGISTICS, LLC v. DUTILDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
  4. EMQORE ENVESECURE PRIVATE CAPITAL TRUST v. SINGHDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
  5. HIDALGO VILLAFANE v. AGUSTAWESTLAND PHILDELPHIA CORPORATIONDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API