Legal Opinion
Cox v. Stretton
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 25, 1974PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. Raymond Amyot, J.
On this motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it fails to state a cause of action, the plaintiffs’ allegations must be accepted as true (Tobin v. Grossman, 24 N Y 2d 609, 612).
It is alleged that the plaintiff, Richard Gr. Cox, and his wife, the plaintiff Minnie Gr. Cox, decided to limit the size of their family to their then existing two infant children, Eugene Cox and Sharon Cox. For the purpose of being rendered sterile, the plaintiff, Richard 0. Cox, on June 6, 1970, consulted the defendant, a licensed physician, for his advice and treatment with respect to a vasectomy. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dobie v. . ArmstrongNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Cuming v. . Brooklyn City R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Duhan v. MilanowskiNew York Supreme Court · 1973
- Morrow v. YannantuonoNew York Supreme Court · 1934
- Rice v. AndrewsNew York Supreme Court · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Stills v. GrattonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Speck v. FinegoldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Salin v. KloempkenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Roth v. BellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
- Hoesing v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.