Legal Opinion

Hoesing v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided February 7, 1980No. Civ. 79-0-191, 79-0-192 and 79-0-195PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

DENNEY, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court upon the defendant’s motion to dismiss.

This is a diversity action in which the plaintiffs seek to recover damages for injuries caused to their parents by the defendant. The defendant contends that this suit should be dismissed because under Nebraska law a child has no cause of action against a third party for damages for nonfatal injuries to his parent. The plaintiffs recognize that the Nebraska Supreme Court has never ruled on the existence of such a cause of action, but contend that the Nebraska Supreme Court’s rulings in…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Borer v. American Airlines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1977
  2. General Electric Company v. BushNevada Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Hoffman v. DautelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  4. Russell v. Salem Transportation Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  5. Jeune v. Del E. Webb Const. Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1954

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Norwest v. Presbyterian Intercommunity HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Durflinger v. ArtilesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  3. Berger v. WeberMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Ueland v. Pengo Hydra-Pull Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Lipari v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1980

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API