Legal Opinion
MagSil Corp. v. Hitachi Global Storage Technologies, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 14, 2012No. 2011-1221PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Chief Judge.
The United States District Court for the District of Delaware granted summary judgment that claims 1-5, 23-26, and 28 of U.S. Patent No. 5,629,922 (“the '922 patent”) are invalid for a lack of enablement. MagSil Corp. v. Seagate Tech., 764 F.Supp.2d 674 (D.Del.2011). Because the record supports the trial court’s judgment, this court affirms.
I
Appellant Massachusetts Institute of Technology is the assignee of the '922 patent and appellant MagSil Corporation is the patent’s exclusive licensee. The application leading to the '922 patent was filed in March 1995 and issued in May…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Genentech, Inc. v. Novo Nordisk, A/s, Novo Nordisk of North America, Inc. And Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- In Re Jack R. Wands, Vincent R. Zurawski, Jr., and Hubert J.P. SchoemakerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Ak Steel Corporation v. Sollac and Ugine, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Cephalon, Inc. v. Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Vasudevan Software, Inc. v. Tibco Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Wyeth & Cordis Corp. v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Iridescent Networks, Inc. v. At&t Mobility, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- McRo, Inc. v. Bandai Namco Games AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.