Legal Opinion · Dissent

Earl v. Roberts Fuel Oil, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1934Published

1DissentBean, J.

I am unable to concur in the majority opinion. The note was originally payable to Fletcher Tire Company and assigned for collection, after maturity, to the plaintiff. The defense claimed by defendant, Roberts Fuel Oil, Inc., is that this note was not given for a corporate obligation, but for the personal obligation of its president, C. H. Roberts, and that the defendant corporation is therefore not liable on the note.

Prior to April 25,1930, C. H. Roberts was engaged in the retail fuel oil business as an individual under the name Roberts Fuel Oil Service, and had become indebted to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Northwest Perfection Tire Co. v. Perfection Tire Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Jones v. FrancisWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Calumet Paper Co. v. Stotts Investment Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  4. Weigar v. SteenOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Curtis, Jones & Co. v. Smelter National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API