Legal Opinion

Birdsong v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 5, 1937No. 26239PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuerry, J.

In this State one accused of crime has the “right to make to the court and jury such statement in the case as he may deem proper in his defense.” Code, § 38-415. In making his statement the defendant is not to be circumscribed by rules of evidence, and thus is not to be confined to the statement of facts which legally will acquit him of the crime charged. Skinner v. State, 13 Ga. App. 370 (2) (79 S. E. 181); Coxwell v. State, 66 Ga. 309 (5); Richardson v. State, 3 Ga. App. 313 (2) (59 S. E. 916); Woodall v. State, 4 Ga. App. 783 (62 S. E. 485). And while the judge may prevent the defendant…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Coxwell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
  2. Vincent v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. Loyd v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
  4. Montross v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  5. Denmark v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Poole v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  3. Ferguson v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Drury v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  5. Felder v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API