Legal Opinion

Cole v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided November 10, 1942No. Claim No. 26049; Claim No. 26050PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGreenberg, J.

Claimants seek to recover the sum of $200 paid by each of them to the State, in applying for licenses as private detectives or investigators, pursuant to article 7 (§§ 70-90) of the General Business Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 20.) They claim that article 7 does not apply to them and that the applications and payments were made under duress. The claims are being discussed together, because the facts are substantially similar and the issues involved are identical.

Since 1930 claimant Cole, and since 1919 claimant Currie, have been and still are engaged in the city of Rochester, New York, in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. La Tourette v. McMasterSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  4. People v. HarrisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schulman v. KellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API