Legal Opinion

National Advanced Systems v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided June 24, 1993No. Court No. 88-01-00015Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Restani, Judge:

This matter is before the court following trial de novo to resolve the issue of proper classification under the Tariff Schedule of the United States (“TSUS”). The product at issue is an Additional Instruction Processor (“AIP”), which is a component utilized to upgrade the Hitachi R-9 line of mainframe computers, for example from a uniprocessor (model 50) to a multiprocessor (model 70). It is essentially the same item (with a few cabling changes) as the basic instruction processor of the R-9 computer series. The United States Customs Service classified the AIP as an “…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Westinghouse Electric International Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  2. Burroughs Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
  3. Burroughs Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API