Legal Opinion

E. B. Dean & Co. v. Lawham

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1879PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Coos County.

1Opinion of the Court

By tbe Court,

Kelly, C. J.:

This was an action for the recovery of personal property brought by the appellants against the respondents, for the possession of nine hundred and twelve fir logs of the value of three thousand seven hundred dollars, in which the appellants, who were the plaintiffs below, claimed that they were lawfully possessed of the same.

This was denied by the defendants, who claimed that they were lawfully possessed of the property and entitled to its return.

The case was tried by the court by consent of the parties without a jury, and the following findings of fact were made:…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cornell v. ToddNew York Supreme Court · 1846
  2. Lyle v. BarkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1813
  3. Warner v. HuntWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Single v. BarnardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Blagen v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Bradtfeldt v. CookeOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Carter v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Coos Bay Railroad v. SiglinOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Temple v. HarringtonOregon Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API