Legal Opinion

Sexton v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided November 5, 1929No. 3 Div. 636PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBbjokkn, P. J.

The indictment, upon which appellant was tried and convicted, contained two counts. The first count charged him with distilling, or manufacturing, alcoholic liquors. The second count charged him with being in possession of a still, etc. The jury found the defendant guilty, as charged in the indictment. The judgment pronounced and entered by the court below recites that the defendant is guilty of distillmg prohibited liquors, and sentenced him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary.

As stated, two separate and distinct offenses were charged in the indictment. The jury…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bell v. OttsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  2. Bradley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  3. Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  4. Driggers v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  5. Sampson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Grayson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Black v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. Scott v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. Couch v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. Sexton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API