Legal Opinion

Wright v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1893PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Perry. Tried before the Hon. John Moore. The facts of this case are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.

This cause was submitted on a motion by the Attorney-General, to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that the judgment rendered will not support the appeal.

The only entry purporting to be a j udgment contained in the record in this case is as follows : “The State vs. Goliath Wright. Charge C. C. W. Fall Term, 1893. Plea not guilty. Jury and verdict. Guilty and fined fifty dollars. Judgment confessed with T. H. Weld, C. W. Ford and W.M. Eiland sureties.’! It requires neither argument nor citation of authorities to show that this statement is wholly inoperative as a judgment. It appears to be no…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Speed v. CockeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  2. Gray v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  3. Nichols v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  4. Ayers v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  5. Thomason v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Knight v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  2. United States v. AlcantaraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  3. Wilkinson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  4. Palmer v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  5. Hardaman v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API