Legal Opinion
Rodio v. Smith
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 14, 1991PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
POLLOCK, J.
Like the companion case, Weinisch v. Sawyer & Allstate Insurance Co., 123 N.J. 333, 587 A. 2d 615 (1991), decided today, this case requires us to determine whether plaintiffs’ claim is properly construed as one for reformation rather than for money damages, and if so, whether a jury trial is available in an action for reformation of an insurance contract. Addition ally, this case raises the issue of whether Allstate Insurance Company’s (Allstate) slogan, “You’re in good hands with Allstate,” violates the Consumer Fraud Act, N.J.S.A. 56:8-2,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jewish Center of Sussex Cty. v. WhaleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Weinisch v. SawyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- Joseph J. Murphy Realty, Inc. v. ShervanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Weinisch v. SawyerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
3Cited by41 opinions
- Shaw v. Digital Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Lemelledo v. Beneficial Management Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Arcand v. Brother International Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- New Jersey Citizen Action v. Schering-Plough Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- Alpine Bank v. HubbellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.