Legal Opinion

Russell v. Agency for Health Care Administration

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 6, 2010No. 2D07-2691PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, the plaintiff in a medical malpractice action brought on behalf of her son, challenges the trial court’s ruling ordering full satisfaction of a Medicaid lien from the proceeds of a settlement between the appellant and the defendants in the malpractice action. For the reasons we explain, we affirm the trial court’s ruling.

Florida’s Medicaid Third-Party Liability Act, § 409.910, Florida Statutes (2006), provides the statutory basis for the assertion by appellee Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) of a lien against third-party benefits obtained by a Medicaid recipient for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Arkansas Department of Health & Human Services v. AhlbornSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Andrews Ex Rel. Andrews v. HaygoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  3. Smith v. Agency for Health Care AdministrationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Tristani Ex Rel. Karnes v. RichmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  2. In re E.B.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. E.M.A. Ex Rel. Plyler v. CanslerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  4. Southwest Fiduciary, Inc. v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  5. Armstrong v. CanslerDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API