Legal Opinion

Andrews Ex Rel. Andrews v. Haygood

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 12, 2008No. 57A07-2PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWBY, Justice.

This case presents the question of whether the statutory framework governing the State’s subrogation claim for medical expenses on a Medicaid recipient’s tort claim settlement complies with federal Medicaid law as interpreted by the Supreme Court of the United States in Arkansas Department of Health & Human Services v. Ahlborn, 547 U.S. 268, 126 S. Ct. 1752, 164 L. Ed. 2d 459 (2006). Because Ahlborn does not mandate a specific method for determining the medical expense portion of a plaintiff’s settlement, we uphold North Carolina’s reasonable statutory scheme and accordingly…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Arkansas Department of Health & Human Services v. AhlbornSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Ramsey Ex Rel. Ramsey v. North Carolina Veterans CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Wayne County Citizens Ass'n for Better Tax Control: Outlaw v. Wayne County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Shaw v. U.S. Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  5. Bockweg v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Wos v. E. M. A. Ex Rel. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Tristani Ex Rel. Karnes v. RichmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  3. Tristani Ex Rel. Karnes v. RichmanDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. In re E.B.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2012
  5. E.M.A. Ex Rel. Plyler v. CanslerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API