Andrews Ex Rel. Andrews v. Haygood
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
NEWBY, Justice.
This case presents the question of whether the statutory framework governing the State’s subrogation claim for medical expenses on a Medicaid recipient’s tort claim settlement complies with federal Medicaid law as interpreted by the Supreme Court of the United States in Arkansas Department of Health & Human Services v. Ahlborn, 547 U.S. 268, 126 S. Ct. 1752, 164 L. Ed. 2d 459 (2006). Because Ahlborn does not mandate a specific method for determining the medical expense portion of a plaintiff’s settlement, we uphold North Carolina’s reasonable statutory scheme and accordingly…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Arkansas Department of Health & Human Services v. AhlbornSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Ramsey Ex Rel. Ramsey v. North Carolina Veterans CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Wayne County Citizens Ass'n for Better Tax Control: Outlaw v. Wayne County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Shaw v. U.S. Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
- Bockweg v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wos v. E. M. A. Ex Rel. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Tristani Ex Rel. Karnes v. RichmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Tristani Ex Rel. Karnes v. RichmanDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- In re E.B.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2012
- E.M.A. Ex Rel. Plyler v. CanslerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.