State v. Walden
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
FRYE, Justice.
I
Defendant brings forward numerous assignments of error which he alleges entitle him to a new trial. Those assignments of error allege that the trial court erred by admitting various hearsay statements into evidence, by expressing an opinion on the evidence when it gave an instruction to the jury following an improper statement by the prosecutor, by failing to instruct the jury that defendant was not required to testify, and by denying defendant’s motions for a mistrial and dismissal of the charges against him. Our review of the entire record discloses that no error was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. MaynardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. HagemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- State v. GladdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. PridgenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.