Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Malley
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided June 3, 1927No. 2775PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This is an original proceeding in habeas corpus, instituted for the purpose of procuring an order directing the reduction of a bail bond. There is no question as to whether such a proceeding is the correct one to obtain the end sought.
The petition alleges that on May 20, 1927, the grand jury of Ormsby County, Nevada, returned seven indictments against the petitioner and two others. The first indictment, omitting technical formalities, charges that the petitioner, being the duly elected, qualified, and acting treasurer of the State of Nevada, had in his possession as such state…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Ex parte DuncanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
- Ex Parte GaffordNevada Supreme Court · 1899
- Ex parte DuncanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
- People of the State of N.Y. v. . TweedNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- In re ScottNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by13 opinions
- Ex Parte WheelerNevada Supreme Court · 1965
- United States v. SchneidermanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1951
- Gusick v. BoiesArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. MastrianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Sims v. JamisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.