Legal Opinion
Kornegay v. City of Raleigh
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided January 20, 1967No. 545PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.
In the appellees’ brief the proposed operation by Southeastern is described as follows:
“[I]t must be noted that CATV system does not obstruct or in any manner actually interfere with the use of the street by the public or with an adjoining property owner. The receiving tower and antenna are located on the CATV Company’s private property, with the co-axial cables which extend Above the city streets being strung upon the existing pole system of the telephone and power companies. Thus The CATV Cables OCCUPY a MiNimal AmouNT oe Air Spaoe Above The City Streets ANB Will in Most Instances Be…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Shaw v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Angell v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
3Cited by12 opinions
- North Carolina Consumers Power, Inc. v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Community Tele-Communications, Inc. v. Heather Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Aberdeen Cable TV Service, Inc. v. City of AberdeenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
- B-C Cable Co. v. City & Borough of JuneauAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Cablevision of Winston-Salem, Inc. v. City of Winston-SalemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.