State v. Hutchinson
Supreme Court of Missouri
1ConcurrenceDonnelly, Judge
I concur fully in the Per Curiam opinion, but file this concurring opinion so that I may express my view that in future cases, wherein the accused does not testify and does not object, trial courts should instruct the jury to the effect “that a defendant cannot be compelled to take the witness *557stand and that the jurors should not permit the failure to testify to influence them in arriving at a verdict.” Miller v. United States, 8th Cir., 410 F.2d 1290, 1296. I find support for this point of view in Caton v. United States, 8th Cir., 407 F.2d 367, wherein the Court expressed itself in the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bruno v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- State v. ShulsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.