Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Brosseau

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 1, 1983No. 82-064; No. 82-277; No. 82-365; No. 82-465Published

1Concurrence

Douglas and Batchelder, JJ.,

concurring specially: While we agree with the result and reasoning of the opinion by our brothers King and Brock, we wish to give fair notice to our coordinate branches of government that the doctrine of sovereign immunity is unconstitutionally broad in its present statutory form.

In Sousa v. State, 115 N.H. 340, 341 A.2d 282 (1975), we addressed a challenge to the doctrine of sovereign immunity. In that case, we deferred to the legislature, stating: “We are of the opinion that at this time, it would be inappropriate for the court to abrogate by judicial action the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Molitor v. Kaneland Community Unit District No. 302Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Nevada v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API