Legal Opinion

Ex parte Oldham

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 1914PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Prohibition: Court of Appeals for Montgomery county.

1Opinion of the Court

David Oldham, a citizen and taxpayer of Shelby county, petitions for a writ of prohibition against the judges of the courts of common pleas to restrain them from acting as a conservancy court upon the ground that the conservancy act is unconstitutional and void.

The preliminary question is whether this court as a matter of right can, or as a matter of discretion should, entertain the writ in advance of action upon *458the jurisdictional question by the tribunal whose jurisdiction is questioned.

The writ of prohibition is a remedy- revived or brought into the jurisprudence of our state by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Walcott v. WellsNevada Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Chester v. ColbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
  3. First Nat'l Bank of Covina v. Ruddock Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  4. County Court of Adams v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. State ex rel. Poston v. District Court of Eighth Judicial District, Fremont CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Rector, Wardens, & Members of the Vestry of St. Bartholomew's Church v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  5. State, Ex Rel. City of Cininnati. v. GeigerOhio Court of Appeals · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API