Legal Opinion
Yoon Ja Kim v. Conagra Foods, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 20, 2006No. 2005-1414PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1316Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge DYK.
Opinion eoneurring-in-part and dissenting-in-part filed by Circuit Judge SCHALL.
DYK, Circuit Judge.
Yoon Ja Kim, the holder of U.S. Patent No. Re. 36,355 (“the '355 patent”), appeals from the district court’s judgment of non-infringement of claim 5 and its dependent claims and claim 10 in favor of ConAgra Foods, Inc. (“ConAgra”). ConAgra cross-appeals from the district court’s judgment that the patent claims are not invalid. We affirm in all respects.
BACKGROUND
The patent in this case relates to bread-making. Oxidizing agents are used during the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Liebel-Flarsheim Company and Mallinckrodt Inc. v. Medrad, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Cardinal Chemical Co. v. Morton International, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. Swift-Eckrich, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Praxair, Inc. v. Atmi, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Symantec Corp. v. Computer Associates International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Martek Biosciences Corp. v. Nutrinova, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Blackboard, Inc. v. Desire2Learn, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Howmedica Osteonics Corp. v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.