In Re Shirel
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION DETERMINING THAT RESPONDENT DOES NOT HAVE A SECURITY INTEREST IN PROPERTY OF THE DEBTORS
RICHARD L. BOHANON, Bankruptcy Judge.
The central issue raised by this motion to avoid a lien is whether or not the respondent has a security interest in property of the debtors. 1
Kevin Shirel applied for a credit card from Sight’N Sound Appliance Centers, Inc., (“Sight and Sound” or “respondent”). 2 The credit application purports to become the agreement of the parties and is a barely legible, seven page, single spaced, small print document. Shirel signed it on the first page.
The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Max True Plastering Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Mitchell v. Shepherd Mall State BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Continental Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. FetterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- In Re HorwitzUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re PattersonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2002
- Southwest State Bank v. Ellis (In Re Ellis)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2004