Legal Opinion

In Re Shirel

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided July 17, 2000No. 19-10652PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION DETERMINING THAT RESPONDENT DOES NOT HAVE A SECURITY INTEREST IN PROPERTY OF THE DEBTORS

RICHARD L. BOHANON, Bankruptcy Judge.

The central issue raised by this motion to avoid a lien is whether or not the respondent has a security interest in property of the debtors. 1

Kevin Shirel applied for a credit card from Sight’N Sound Appliance Centers, Inc., (“Sight and Sound” or “respondent”). 2 The credit application purports to become the agreement of the parties and is a barely legible, seven page, single spaced, small print document. Shirel signed it on the first page.

The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Max True Plastering Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. Mitchell v. Shepherd Mall State BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  4. Continental Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. FetterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  5. In Re HorwitzUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re PattersonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2002
  2. Southwest State Bank v. Ellis (In Re Ellis)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API