Aaron Joseph Morrow v. State of Minnesota
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRAS, Justice.
Appellant Aaron Joseph Morrow, appeals the postconviction court’s summary denial of his ineffective-assistanee-of-appellate-counsel claims. Because we conclude that the petition, files, and records of the proceeding conclusively show that Morrow is not entitled to relief, we affirm.
I
On September 26, 2010, Morrow fired his AK-47 at three people, killing one and injuring another. 1 A Ramsey County grand jury indicted Morrow on nine separate counts, including one count of first-degree premeditated murder, Minn.Stat. § 609.185(a)(1) (2014); one count of first-degree murder…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Ives v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Arredondo v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jetaun Helen Wheeler v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Berry Alexander Davis, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, RespondentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2025
- Denis Alcivar Alvarado-Riera v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017