Legal Opinion

Aaron Joseph Morrow v. State of Minnesota

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 21, 2016No. A16-117PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STRAS, Justice.

Appellant Aaron Joseph Morrow, appeals the postconviction court’s summary denial of his ineffective-assistanee-of-appellate-counsel claims. Because we conclude that the petition, files, and records of the proceeding conclusively show that Morrow is not entitled to relief, we affirm.

I

On September 26, 2010, Morrow fired his AK-47 at three people, killing one and injuring another. 1 A Ramsey County grand jury indicted Morrow on nine separate counts, including one count of first-degree premeditated murder, Minn.Stat. § 609.185(a)(1) (2014); one count of first-degree murder…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  3. Ives v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  4. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  5. Arredondo v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jetaun Helen Wheeler v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  2. Berry Alexander Davis, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, RespondentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2025
  3. Denis Alcivar Alvarado-Riera v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API