Legal Opinion

Ball v. CITY OF BLACKFOOT

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 2012No. 38530PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Justice.

JoAn and Fred Ball (JoAn and Fred, collectively the Balls) are patrons of the City of Blackfoot’s (the City) municipal pool. JoAn slipped on ice accumulated on the sidewalk between the pool and the parking lot. The Balls brought suit against the City. The district court granted summary judgment dismissing the Balls’ claims on the ground that, under Pearson v. Boise City, 80 Idaho 494, 333 P.2d 998 (1959), property owners are not liable for injuries resulting from natural accumulations of snow or ice. We reverse.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On February 28, 2008, moments…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. ZichkoIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Gutierrez v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  3. Harrison v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Salinas v. VierstraIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Hecla Mining Co. v. Star-Morning Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rountree v. Boise Baseball, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Sales v. PeabodyIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Stephen Boswell v. Amber Dawn SteeleIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. David W. Stiles v. Walter A. AmundsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Twylla Robinson v. Connie MuellerIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API