Legal Opinion

David W. Stiles v. Walter A. Amundson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 2016No. Docket 43289PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. JONES, Justice.

I. NATURE OF THE CASE

This appeal arises out of a premises liability action brought against Walter Amundson (“Walter”), the owner of a piece of property in Kuna, Idaho (the “Property”), by David Stiles (“Stiles”), a social guest of one of Walter’s tenants. The district court dismissed the case on summary judgment, reasoning that: (1) Walter had neither a general duty of care nor a duty to warn with respect to Stiles; and (2) although Walter could be liable for any injury resulting from the negligent repair of the Property, Walter’s repair was riot the proximate cause of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stephens v. StearnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Harrison v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Peterson v. RomineIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Conner v. HodgesIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Alsup v. Saratoga Hotel, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Forbush v. Sagecrest Multi Family Property Owners' Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Alves v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2022
  3. Forbush v. Sagecrest Multi Family Property Owners' Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API