Legal Opinion
Ross v. Bolton
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 10, 1986No. 83 Civ. 8244 (WK)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
WHITMAN KNAPP, District Judge.
All defendants move to dismiss the amended complaint. The Bolton defendants and Bear, Steams & Co. move as well to dismiss the cross-claims of defendant Forbes, Walsh, Kelly & Co., Inc. For the reasons stated below, we direct that the complaint against Bear Steams and Forbes Walsh Kelly’s third counter-claim against the Bolton defendants be dismissed.
This is the second time we have considered motions to dismiss in this action. We failed the first time to perceive a cognizable claim against Bear Steams and by order dated April 20, 1984 dismissed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Landy v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards, Inc. v. BernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Spradlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cromer Finance Ltd. v. BergerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Ross v. BoltonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Ross v. BoltonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Connolly v. HavensDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- McDaniel v. Bear Stearns & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.