Legal Opinion

Alford v. Kruse

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 2, 1931No. 28,066PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Action to recover damages for a breach of warranty in the sale of three registered Guernsey cows. The court directed a verdict -for the defendant at the close of the plaintiff’s testimony. The defendant rested without offering evidence. The plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The plaintiff owned a herd of graded Guernseys and operated a dairy farm a mile and a half southwest of Fargo, North Dakota. He was in search of registered Guernseys for breeding purposes to build up a pure-bred herd. The defendant was a breeder of registered Guernseys and owned and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Grayson v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Bekkevold v. PottsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Redhead Bros. v. Wyoming Cattle Investment Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  4. Merchants' & Mechanics' Savings Bank v. FrazeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. McQuaid v. RossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ver Steegh v. FlaughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  2. Albers Milling Company v. CarneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  3. Frame v. HohrmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  4. Backus v. MacLauryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  5. Kastner v. WermerskirschenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API