Legal Opinion

Bodley v. Emporia National Bank

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1887PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from Franklin District Court. Action by The Bank against Bodley and two others, to recover upon a promissory note. Judgment for the plaintiff, at the January Term, 1886. The defendants bring the case to this court. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J.:

The Emporia National Bank brought this action, in the district court of Franklin county, against O. G. Bodley,- F. J. Bodley and J. D. Bodley, to recover upon a promissory note given by them on June 17,1882, promising to pay on June 17,1884, to the order of Wm. H. Woodlief, $2,800, with interest from date at ten per cent, per annum. On May 8,1883, a payment of $550 was indorsed on the note, and shortly afterward it was duly transferred to A. M. Blair, who in turn, and before the maturity of the note, indorsed and sold it to the bank. The…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. Nelson Land & Cattle Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
  2. Newell v. Harrison Engineering & Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  3. Hardy v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
  4. First National Bank v. ElliottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  5. Delpit v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API