Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Elliott

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1891PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Cowley District Court. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion. Judgment for the defendant Elliott, at the December term, 1887. The plaintiff Bank brings the case to this court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Green, C.:

This case was a consolidation of two actions commenced by the First National Bank of Fort Scott against Charles H. Elliott, in the district court of Cowley county, upon two notes made by him to the order of the Eureka Bank, and in its possession as indorsee. Each note was dated October 7,1881, one being for $1,000, and due in 365 days after date, and another for $825, due in 540 days after date. The allegations of the petitions were that the defendant was indebted to the plaintiff upon certain notes, which were set out in the petition in full, with all indorsements…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mann v. Second National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  2. Hadden v. RodkeySupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  3. Lyon v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  4. Bodley v. Emporia National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  5. Ecton v. HarlanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stevens v. KeeganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  2. Bernard v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API