Legal Opinion

Roberto v. Nielson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 14, 1941PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as the result of the alleged negligent operation of an automobile by the defendant, judgment for plaintiff reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. Except as to that part of defendant’s Exhibit B for identification which states “ but evidently, after a day of beer & wine drinking, he was somehow involved in an auto accident,” the exclusion of the other portions of the hospital records (Defendant’s Exhibits B and C for Identification) was erroneous. Hospital records are to be admitted in evidence…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Meiselman v. Crown Heights Hospital, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1941

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Constantinides v. Manhattan Transit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  2. Wadena v. BushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  3. Del Toro v. CarrollAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  4. Del Re v. City of New YorkAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1943
  5. In re the Estate of KirkbyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API