United States v. Bugarín
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
CARLOS F. LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
Jesús Bugarin challenges the substantive reasonableness of his sentence at the bottom of the applicable advisory United States Sentencing Guidelines (“Guidelines”) range for possession with intent to distribute more than 1,000 kilograms of marijuana. Because the district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing that sentence, it is substantively reasonable. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742, we affirm.
I
On March 10, 2006, Bugarin’s tractor-trailer was stopped leaving Arizona at the Gallup, New Mexico…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Greenlaw v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. KristlCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. SmartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. GarciaDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
- FONTALVO v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009