Legal Opinion

Harrell v. State

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 28, 2012No. 41955-6-IIPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohanson, J.

¶1 Garrett Harrell sued the Washington Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) for discrimination under state and federal law, claiming that as a matter of law, DSHS failed to reasonably accommodate his night blindness. The trial court denied his summary judgment motion and dismissed his federal claims, but it allowed trial of his state law claims. The jury found in DSHS’s favor. Harrell appeals the trial court’s denial of his summary judgment and new trial motions as well as its dismissal of his federal law claims. We affirm because issues of material fact existed to preclude summary…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Trizuto v. Bellevue Police DepartmentDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2013
  2. Jason & Elizabeth Brooks v. Bpm Senior Living CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API