Legal Opinion

Pollock v. Morris

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1988No. 87-971PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

R.C. 2725.05 provides, in pertinent part, that:

“If it appears that a person alleged to be restrained of his liberty is in the custody of an officer under process issued by a court or magistrate, or by virtue of the judgment or order of a court of record, and that the court or magistrate had jurisdiction to issue the process, render the judgment, or make the order, the writ of habeas corpus shall not be allowed. * * *”

Appellant maintains that he is entitled to a writ of habeas corpus inasmuch as no other legal remedy is available to him. He asserts that he was incompetent at the time he…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stahl v. ShoemakerOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Padavick v. City of Cleveland HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Douglas v. MoneyOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Douglas v. MoneyOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State ex rel. Rackley v. Sloan (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State ex rel. Mitchell v. PittmanOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Starkey v. ShoopOhio Court of Appeals · 2021

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API