Legal Opinion
Padavick v. City of Cleveland Heights
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 18, 1973No. 72-617PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
The petition of the appellee stated that he was unlawfully imprisoned and restrained of his liberty. A search of the record reveals no evidence to support this allegation. The record clearly shows that he was charged *16and tried in the Cleveland Heights Municipal Court, and was convicted and sentenced under journal entries executed by the judge of that court.
R. C. 2725.05 provides as follows:
“If it appears that a person alleged to be restrained of his liberty is in the custody of an officer under process issued by a court or magistrate, or by virtue of the judgment or order of a court of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Freeman v. MaxwellOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- In re CopleyOhio Supreme Court · 1972
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bobby Brewer v. Eric G. DahlbergCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Pollock v. MorrisOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re AndersonOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
- Collins v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1991