Legal Opinion
Clovis Carl Green, Jr. v. Peter Carlson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 6, 1992No. 91-16458Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
972 F.2d 1339
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Clovis Carl GREEN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Peter CARLSON, et al., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 91-16458.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 29, 1992.*
Decided Aug. 6, 1992.
Before TANG, BEEZER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Robi v. Five Platters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Jose Luis Pena v. Seguros La Comercial, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- James F. Taylor v. MacE KnappCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Michael Joseph Molloy v. Mark WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.