Legal Opinion

Gostyla v. Chambers

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 19, 2017No. AC38943PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.

In this negligence action stemming from a motor vehicle collision, the plaintiff, Jeffrey F. Gostyla, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the defendant, Bryan Chambers. The plaintiff claims that he is entitled to a new trial because the court improperly allowed one of the defendant's expert witnesses, a biomechanical engineer, to provide opinion testimony on a matter that went beyond the purview of his expertise in biomechanics, namely, whether the plaintiff's personal injuries were caused by the collision. Although we agree that the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nimely v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  2. Claude I. Smelser v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Norfolk and Western Railway Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  3. Combs v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1998
  4. Bowers v. Norfolk Southern Corp.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 2007
  5. Hayes v. CamelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MorleyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  2. Corbo v. SavlukConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  3. Elizabeth Clark v. Kermit Hahn and Evelyn HahnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024
  4. Gostyla v. ChambersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
  5. Manhas Vs. TinkerNevada Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API