Legal Opinion
Bay City-Abrahams Bros., Inc. v. Estee Lauder, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 17, 1974No. 73 Civ. 4207 (JMC)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANNELLA, District Judge:
Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(b), is granted and the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment dismissing the complaint.
The court grants the instant motion because plaintiff has failed entirely to state a claim upon which relief may be had. No state of facts which might constitute a cause of action cognizable at law has here been advanced. 1 In order that the decision of the court, as embraced in the succeeding paragraphs, may be placed in better perspective, the court now briefly outlines the factual setting of this case. The…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Oreck Corporation v. Whirlpool Corporation and Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Charlotte Fusco and Daniel Boe v. Xerox CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Distillers Co. Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Optivision, Inc. v. Syracuse Shopping Center AssociatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1979
- Diehl & Sons, Inc. v. International Harvester Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1976
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.